The U.S. Supreme Court opened its 2008-2009 term on October 6 with six labor and employment law cases on its docket.  (For docket information and questions presented, click on the name of the case). 

  • Locke v. Karass:  may a public employee union may charge nonmembers for representational costs for litigation expenses incurred by the international union

Earlier this week, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled  that an employer does not violate the National Labor Relations Act by refusing to reinstate economic strikers because it had hired permanent replacements, even though those "permanent" workers are at-will employees.   The decision in United Steelworkers v. NLRB upheld an earlier National Labor Relations Board ruling

You have an employee who is using the breakroom as his bully pulpit, discussing his political views with his coworkers.  Some coworkers complain to you that they don’t want to hear it, so you call the employee in to your office and tell him to keep his views and opinions to himself.  A no-brainer, right? 

Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued four labor and employment-related decisions; none, however, were big surprises or substantial changes in the law.

 First, in Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, the Court held 8-0 that an employer defending an Age Discrimination in Employment Act case bears the burden of proving a "reasonable factors other than age" or "RFOA" affirmative defense.  Truth be told, most defense lawyers have assumed that it was the employer’s burden to prove the affirmative defense; this decision simply confirms that assumption. 
Continue Reading Big Day at the Supreme Court: Four New L&E Decisions