Legislation that significantly altered an employer’s ability to utilize noncompete agreements in the state of Oregon took effect on January 1, 2008. How has the new law impacted corporate policies around restrictive covenants? What are the new best practices you need to implement to stay in compliance?
For answers to these questions and more, join
The Oregon Supreme Court recently ruled that a corporation’s board of directors are not employees, and therefore not subject to Oregon’s unemployment tax. In Necanicum Investment Co. v. Oregon Employment Department, the Supreme Court reversed a 2007 Oregon Court of Appeals decision that had held unemployment tax should be assessed on the fees paid
In SAIF Corp. v. Sprague, the Oregon Court of Appeals ruled earlier this week that an obese employee’s gastric bypass surgery was coverd by workers’ compensation. For the full opinion, click here.
The employee in Sprague suffered an on-the-job knee injury in in 1976. He weighed 225 pounds at the time of the injury.
Local athletes did remarkably well at the 2008 Track and Field Olympic Trials in Eugene, Oregon, which raises an interesting leave issue. It’s an obscure law, but Oregon requires employers to give Olympic athletes leave to compete. Under ORS 659.865, it is an unlawful employment practice for an employer to infringe on an employee’s
Plaintiffs suing their employers under the Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA") may recover lost wages, but they may not recover emotional distress damages. What if an employee misses work because of emotional distress that is caused by a wrongful denial of FMLA leave? The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that such damages are a form of lost wages and therefore may be recovered under FMLA.
Continue Reading Ninth Circuit Affirms “Emotional Distress Damages” Caused by Denial of FMLA Leave
In Emerald v. Bureau of Labor, The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed a Bureau of Labor and Industries determination that an employer must reasonably accommodate an employee’s off-duty medical marijuana use. However, the case was affirmed on a technicality – again leaving Oregon employers wondering if they really have to accommodate an employee’s medical marijuana use. Continue Reading Oregon Court of Appeals: Keep Accommodating Medical Marijuana (For Now….)
Oregon’s anti-discrimination statute allows an employee alleging employment discrimination to file either a lawsuit (which results in a jury trial) or an administrative complaint with the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (which results in an administrative hearing with no jury). In Emerald v. Bureau of Labor, the employer argued that allowing an employee to arbitrarily choose whether or not there will be a jury trial violates the employer’s right to a jury trial under the Oregon Constitution. Not so, ruled the Oregon Court of Appeals earlier this week. Continue Reading Oregon Court of Appeals Upholds Employment Discrimination Statute
The Oregon Supreme Court ruled that employees could not sue their employer for back pay over missed rest and meal breaks. Want to know more? You can either read the court’s opinion, or read a more concise yet equally informative summary of Garfur v. Legacy written by yours truly. Note to employers: don’t start making your